Workshop 1: Ran by Rory, he started with a warm up getting us to start in a small circle and saying controversial topics to try and get opinions differentiating within the group, for example, abortion on the NHS, the adoption of critically ill children and the bombing of ISIS, this helped us get our brains thinking about how their was a differentiation between 4 people let alone countries and how topics have to be handled sensitivity as it can untimely result in wars etc. He then gave us two different news articles, one from Social Worker and one from The Times, we analysed the content and how the two news websites worded and presented things differently, it was interesting to see the biased opinions pushed upon the audience in the social worker compared to the reporter, fact and figure style of The Times. After spending 15 minutes talking about the language, the proposed views and our opinions on them we moved on to split into two groups one taking Social Worker and the other taking the news report from The Times.
Me and Abbie had Social Worker, we did slight research and worked out that Social Worker are always filmed talking on the streets, "socially immersed" in what ever event is going on and are very biased in their opinions. We went through the extract and picked the best points e.g "going to war will kill innocent civilians, accidents happen" and we then tried to report in the style of two Social Worker reporters to show their style and way of work compared to the very strict, "behind a desk" factual portray of The Times.
Good Kennedy you are thinking about the style and content here, link the idea to your narrative (the missing girl).
ReplyDelete